Phosphorescent Paint in Glass Laminates

Date: 14 August 2020
Copyright:
  • Stefan Reich, Shawn Ives, Christian Pfütze
  • Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Department of Architecture, Facility Management and Geoinformation, Building Envelope Research Group, Dessau, Germany, stefan.reich@hs-anhalt.de
  • First presented at GPD 2019

Date: 7 August 2020

The paper describes the research and development of phosphorescent glass.

This paper was first presented at GPD 2019 by Stefan Reich, Shawn Ives and Christian Pfütze from Anhalt University of Applied Sciences.

Defined by the building law in each publicly accessible building (e.g. schools, administration etc.) emergency exit routes have to be marked. This is usually realized by means of active or passive lightening systems. The use of passive lightening systems require comprehensive components with an independent, battery-powered energy-supply that produces light even in the case of an energy black-out (e.g. disaster situations), which makes the systems complicated and expansive.

Alternatively after-glowing, phosphorescent signs, attached on walls, wallpapers or doors are an existing alternative. Mostly known to everybody are the green emergency exit signs. Used inside of buildings their appearance has mostly a disturbing and negative attitude, even more at premium interior designs.

Both described solutions have been known for many decades and possess individual disadvantages. There-fore the composition of passive lightened systems with premiumquality surfaces leads to a widely usable product phosphorescent glass. This glass consists of laminated glass with a phosphorescent paint application within the glass interlayer. The paper describes the research and development of phosphorescent glass.

The processing focus lies on the materials investigation of different paints, different EVA-interlayers and glass surfaces with respect to various glass laminate build-ups as well as the development of an appropriate application process of the multi-layer paint application. The second part explains the mechanical testing of the laminated glass specimens with regard to their shear and balldrop strength before and after accelerated aging in temperature-moisture climate similar to IGU-testing standards.

 

1 Introduction

If we look into our office or residential spaces there are many situations with illuminated signs in the dark. The most common ones are emergency exit signs. State of the art is the use of phosphorescent plastic signs or battery powered lighted signs that are attached to walls or phosphorescent paint used for emergency exit lanes. All together is the lack of high quality surfaces with phosphorescent functions.

Starting with this situation, we asked if we could obtain laminated glass with patterns, which can glow in the dark with phosphorescent materials inside the glasses, therefore between a glass panel and an interlayer or between two interlayer films. Possible applications of this phosphorescence glass can be divided into interior design uses without any building code requirement and load bearing structurally glasses, e.g. facades panels, as covered in building codes.

 

2 Materials and methods

2.1 The norms and test background

The testing and decision procedures cover the fields of (i) visual quality, (ii) phosphorescence, (iii) long term behaviour at accelerated climate loads, (iv) shear test of laminated phosphorescent glass and (v) mechanical behaviour compered to standard laminated safety glass.

Whereas (i) and (ii) consider individual quality and performance specifications, (iii) long term behaviour of laminated safety glass requires the adoption of existing aging test procedure to LSG to judge the resistance against humidity and temperature. We decided to use the aging cycle of EN 1279-2 [1] for the aging tests. Although phosphorescent glass laminates are usually not exposed to climate loads as IGUs the test puts the glasses into a climate aging process. As result, we describe the visual appearance of the glasses as qualitative benchmark for glass resistance against humidity and temperature.

For the shear resistance (iv), we will simply compare the shear resistance of our samples and compare them to laminated safety glass (LSG) we can find in construction. The test results serve as qualitative comparable values of the shear strength of the laminates. The ball drop testing (v) according to standard LSG tests is the final test series to describe the relative behaviour of different phosphorescent glass build-ups to standard LSG. These tests allow considering the use of the phosphorescent glass as structural element.

2.2 Constraints

In this project, our industrial partner should be enabled to control the whole production process, which means we did not consider using phosphorescent films to integrate in the laminates to prevent any chemical incompatibility. The choice of interlayer materials, the lamination process as well as the application of wet phosphorescent paint products occurred according to the company production specifications.

2.3 Material behaviour

Generally, we used the materials float glass, different EVA-interlayers and different phosphorescent colours to build the samples. We focused on green phosphorescent paint. This colour has the maximum glowing intensity compared to other colours. Standard brush paint “Afterglow Color Water-based green” (from UV-elements) and spray “Phosporescent Spray Paint” (from StardustColors) were applied and investigated. Four different EVAfilms were used as interlayer material.

In preliminary testing, the wetting of various glass and interlayer surfaces were investigated by means of surface angle measurements using the Krüss drop shape analyser DSA 25. Different combination have been tested: water or spray paint on float glass, sanded float glass and EVA film.

The contact angles are read in a way, where 0° is a complete wetting. Between 0° and 90°, the solid is wettable and above 90° it is not wettable.

Table 1   Surface angle (°)
Table 1   Surface angle (°)

Generally, the wetting results are better on sanded glass compared to a smooth glass surface, which shows a more similar and equal colour quality. The surface angle does not invite the application of the paint directly on EVA-film that does not show appropriate visual appearance during the specimen production.

About the risk in case of fire, it is as important as without the paint, this is because of the EVA films. In the technical description of the paint, it is not inflammable, but in case of thermoreaction, it will release carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.

Figure 1   Spray paint on float glass
Figure 1   Spray paint on float glass
Figure 2   Spray paint on EVA film
Figure 2   Spray paint on EVA film

2.4 Concept of phosphorescence

Figure 3 Paint directly applied on glass
Figure 3 Paint directly applied on glass

Phosphorescence means the absorption of energy by a material or substance and released as light. It is in some aspect similar to fluorescence except that the release of energy in the form of light takes a longer time.

A phosphorescent paint will thus charge itself during an exposure to UV-light (contained in natural light) and will “glow-inthe-dark” during the night. The progress of phosphorescent pigments allows to charge pigments enough during a short day to glow a whole night, although no producer can guarantee a full night with a powerful glow.

 

3 Preliminary testing

3.1 Design of experiment

Figure 4 Paint between two layers of film
Figure 4 Paint between two layers of film

The research was considered as a two-stage process, with a broad preliminary testing and specified details testing series.

The preliminary testing included the shear and durability tests of the specimen. Main objective of these tests was to define the principle build-up of the phosphorescence glass: does the paint need to be in con-tact with the glass or between two interlayer films? So logically, two build-up designs were chosen, shown in Fig 3 and 4. The total thickness of the interlayer films was 0.76 mm in both build-ups. 

Another factor was the choice between liquid paint and spray paint for the aesthetic aspect and the reaction with the films. The matrixes of the executed experiments are shown in the following tables.

Table 2 Matrix durability test and shear test
Table 2 Matrix durability test and shear test

3.2 Protocol for paint application directly on glass

The first panel of glass has to be cleaned; the paint is then applied in 6 layers with a drying time of 30 seconds between each layer for spray paint and one of 30 minutes for liquid paint. Then, the samples are left to dry for at least 4 days to reduce the volatile organic compounds. The second panel of glass is then cleaned as well. Afterwards the film is put in between the two glass panels and the glass is laminated in a vacuum bag.

Figure 5    Durability samples with sprayed paint
Figure 5    Durability samples with sprayed paint
Figure 6   Durability samples with liquid paint
Figure 6   Durability samples with liquid paint

3.3 Protocol for paint application between two films

The film on which the paint will be applied is cleaned; as for the previous protocol, 6 layers of paint are applied with the same drying time between each. After at least 4 days of drying, the glass panels are cleaned and the paint will be in between the two films which themselves will be in between the two glass panels.

3.4 Results of durability and shear tests

The durability test results confirmed the experiences gathered at the samples production, that the application of paint on the interlayer does not deliver a sufficient optical quality.

The application of the paint directly on the float glass surface delivered much better visual qualities, but also showed that EVA2 and EVA3 produced significantly more bubbles and flaws than EVA1 and EVA4, that deliver a satisfying result with minimum delamination. Furthermore, the aesthetic value of the brushed paint is not convincing, therefore only the sprayed paint will be used for further tests.

Figure 7    No sufficient visual quality at sample with EVA 2 and paint sprayed between two films
Figure 7    No sufficient visual quality at sample with EVA 2 and paint sprayed between two films
Figure 8   No sufficient visual quality at sample with EVA 4 and brushed paint between two films
Figure 8   No sufficient visual quality at sample with EVA 4 and brushed paint between two films

3.5 Results of Luminescence tests

The samples have been charged 12 hours with standard interior light and measured directly after the charging to obtain the values of table.

Measuring the luminescence confirms that the samples with sprayed paint glow with much more intensity and keep glowing in the dark for many hours whereas the samples with liquid paint stop glowing after few hours. The similar glowing intensity of the specimens in both pictures is caused by different exposure times of the camera. Applying phosphorescent paint between two films lead to lower luminescence as the charging of the colour is hindered by the reduced light transmission ratio of the EVA.

Figure 9   Mechanism of the shear test
Figure 9   Mechanism of the shear test
Figure 10   Shear testing
Figure 10   Shear testing
Table 3 Average shear strength of the samples with sprayed and brushed liquid paint (MPa)
Table 3 Average shear strength of the samples with sprayed and brushed liquid paint (MPa)

 

Figure 11    Paint sprayed on the glass
Figure 11    Paint sprayed on the glass
Figure 12   Paint brushed on the glass
Figure 12   Paint brushed on the glass
Table 4 Average luminescence of the samples (lux)
Table 4 Average luminescence of the samples (lux)

 

4 Detailed testing

4.1 Design of experiment

Because of the preliminary testing results only EVA 1 and 4 and spray paint applied on sanded glasses instead of smooth float glasses are used further. It was expected that the samples react differently due to the paint layers number and area of the painted surface. The specimens have a 3 cm wide frame to avoid any influence of an open paint edge.

Table 5 Matrix for the durability tests samples
Table 5 Matrix for the durability tests samples

For the shear test samples, the same number of layers are used but also the covered area factor of 20%, 50% and 80% paint area.

The ball drop tests according to EN 14449 were done with identical paint pattern. All samples possess eight paint layers and are partly sanded at the painted area. Thirty specimens were produced only with EVA2, due to a final production shut-down of EVA1.

Figure 13   Samples in the climate chambe
Figure 13   Samples in the climate chambe
Table 6 Matrix for the samples of shear tests (* no samples available)
Table 6 Matrix for the samples of shear tests (* no samples available)
Figure 14    Sample a) 80% painted, b) 50% painted, c) 20% painted
Figure 14    Sample a) 80% painted, b) 50% painted, c) 20% painted

4.2 Results

The durability tests confirmed the preliminary results for samples with both EVA-films. A deterioration of the visual appearance was not observed after the testing. The 3 cm EVAframe around the paint acts as proofing and protects the painted areas. The results of the shear testing are shown in the table.

The shear tests of 145 samples show a higher shear strength of laminates with EVA1 compared to EVA4. A positive effect of a sanded surface on the shear strength is supposed, as the non-sanded and/or non-painted samples achieved lower shear strength than sanded ones. An influence of paint thickness (no. of layers) and paint area ratio cannot clearly derived from the results. More specimen had to be tested to clarify these influence parameters. The results of the ball drop test are currently pending.

Table 7 Average shear strength (MPa)
Table 7 Average shear strength (MPa)

 

5 Discussion and Acknowledgements

Several hundred samples of many buildups and material combinations were tested. They showed that the application process is essential for a successful phosphorescent glass. A fine-tuned composition of paint, interlayer and surface plus a proofed application process lead us to convincing specimens. A paint application on the interlayer should be avoided whereas paint on a sanded glass surface showed the most stable and durable behaviour. The durability testing demonstrated the long term stability for interior uses. The shear strength stays at the level of compare samples of pure LSG without paint.

This research was commonly conducted with the company GlasAhne GmbH from Pirna, Germany and funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy in the AiF-ZIM funding. We like to thank both parties for supporting this research.

 

[1] EN 1279-2:2002 Glass in building; Insulating glass units; Part 2: Long term test method and requirements for moisture penetration.
[2] EN 14449:2005 Glass in building; Laminated glass and laminated safety glass.

600450 Phosphorescent Paint in Glass Laminates glassonweb.com

Others also read

In this paper we will look at the potential of what is now a commonly used component in facade design - a load-bearing glass wall panel.
The world of constructions and building envelope has been evolving in recent years and the curtain wall has become the main expression of the architects’ imagination.
We have seen rapid expansion in the last decade of laminated glass design using modern analytical and computational methods.
Time-temperature superposition principle is widely used to generate interlayer modulus properties in the form of mastercurves for use in glass design.
Historically, monolithic tempered glass has been primarily used in North America, but with the recent changes to the International Building Code (IBC 2015), laminates with heat strengthened or tempered glass are now required.
This paper presents an evaluation of the use of annealed laminated glass incorporating the stiffer PVB interlayers.

FROM INDUSTRY

Ottergemsesteenweg 707-Zuid
9000 Ghent
Belgium

52 Corniche El-Nil, AL-SHARIFAIN Tower 10th Floor,
Maadi,
Cairo Governorate
11728
Egypt

Polígono Industrial El Bayo, parcela I, 19
24492 Cubillos del Sil León
Spain

No. 160 Yichuan Rd.,
Jiaonan Shi
Qingdao Shi
Shandong Sheng, 266000
China

Is Kuleleri, Kule: 2, Kat: 22, 4. Levent
34330 Levent-Istanbul/İstanbul
Turkey

Ctra. Estación Km. 15.8
44415 Rubielos de Mora Teruel
Spain

Add new comment