Experimental investigation on the compressive response of laminated glass members

Date: 19 July 2013
  • Giuseppe Campione, Giovanni Minafò, Francesco Poma
Shape of specimens tested in compression
Photo source
Giuseppe Campione, Giovanni Minafò, Francesco Poma
A series of four-point bending tests were carried out on monolithic and laminated panels in order to evaluate the ultimate tensile stress of the glass considered and the effective level of connection between the glass foils.

Giuseppe Campione, Giovanni Minafò, Francesco Poma


Experimental program

The general experimental program provided compressive tests on single panels and on assembled panels, making up a column (Aiello et al. 2011 and Campione et al. 2012). A series of four-point bending tests were carried out on monolithic and laminated panels in order to evaluate the ultimate tensile stress of the glass considered and the effective level of connection between the glass foils.

Specimens were manufactured with laminated glass, which was composed by two foils of float glass with thickness 4 mm connected by a polyvinylbutiral (PVB) film having thickness equal to 1 mm. Bending tests were performed on three monolithic and three laminated panels for each series. The specimens’ dimensions were respectively 300x100 mm, while the thickness was 4 mm for monolithic specimens and 9 mm (4+1+4) for multilayer panels. Compressive tests were carried out on single panels and columns.

The latter were characterized by two different cross-section shapes; on the basis of the number of assembled panels, the column had a rectangular cross-section (Figure 1 a) a T-shaped cross-section (Figure1b) or a X-shaped cross-section (Figure1c). Columns were assembled with a main panel having width 300 mm and one (T-shaped section) or two (X-shaped section) orthogonally disposed panels with side 150 mm.

Assembling was achieved by structural silicone glazing. Single panels had width 300 mm, thickness 9 mm (4+1+4) and height L equal to 300, 400, 500 and 600 mm, while for columns it was equal to 600, 800 and 1000 mm. A pair of specimens was tested for each kind (series and geometry).

Figure 1. Shape of specimens tested in compression:

a) single panel; b) T shape; c) X shape


Experimental results

It has to be noted that the target of the present work was the characterization of the instantaneous behaviour of laminated glass members; hence tests were carried out in a short time and consequently viscous and long-term effects were not taken into account.

These effects are of fundamental importance for laminated glass members (Bricoli Bati et al. 1010, Biolzi et al 1010, Aiello et al. 2011, Amadio and Bedon 2011, Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni 2012), which are made up with an interposed viscous-elastic material (PVB for instance), whose mechanical properties are affected by time, temperature, humidity and so on.

Bending tests were performed in a controlled environment with a temperature value equal to 18°C and humidity of 50%. The test results on the monolithic panels showed that average ultimate stress values of monolithic glass specimens were 37 N/mm2.

For compressive tests panels were mounted in the supports described above; attention was paid to positioning, in order to center the application of the load with respect to the plates of the testing machine and to avoid eccentricities. As expected, brittle failure was observed due to a buckling phenomenon.

From the point of view of failure observed (see Figure 2 on the following page) at an initial stage only one flange showed diffused cracking while the orthogonal panel had fewer cracks, only on one halfside and mainly concentrated at the ends and in the middle-height, meaning that it was restraining buckling of the other panel.

It has to be noted that columns were produced by gluing a continuous panel with two shorter pieces and a slight difference in height between the two flanges could occur. Therefore the higher flange first carried most of the compressive load while a piece of the orthogonal fl ange restrained buckling of mail panels and carried a smaller part of the load.

The load-displacement curves (Figure 3a, see p. 41) show that the panels behaved in a linear-elastic manner down to failure, without strength recovery.

Fig 3a) refers to specimens with length of 300, 500, 600 and 800 mm. As expected, the failure load decreased with the height of the panel.

It is interesting to observe that by increasing the length the stiffness of the compressed members decreases, as do the critical load and the corresponding maximum shortening. When the maximum load is attained, sudden and brittle failure is observed, with no residual strength. Figure 3 b) (see p. 41) shows the axial load-shortening curves for T-shaped columns. In this case the peak loads for the different lengths examines are in the range of 30%.



In this paper, the results of an experimental investigation on glass members were presented and discussed. The compressive behaviour of laminated glass panels and columns was examined, the flexural behaviour of panels also being analyzed.

For the range of variables analyzed the following conclusions can be drawn.

- the buckling strength of panels strictly depends on the slenderness;

- the level of connection experimentally determined depends on the type of glass examined, also for standard temperature and humidity conditions. This fact highlighted the importance of the manufacturing process of laminated glass;

- limiting the slenderness ratio in glass columns did not make it possible to avoid quasi-brittle failure. Indeed, local buckling occurred, due to the small thickness of the flanges making up the columns;

- by adopting a T of X shape of the transverse crosssection buckling effects are reduced but failure is governed by rupture on single panels as a consequence of rupture at the interfaces between single panels.

Figure 2. Typical failure modes observed experimentally in compression




Figure 3. Axial load-shortening curves for members with cross-section: a) rectangular, b) T shape; c) X shape



Amadio, C., Bedon, C. (2011). “Buckling of laminated glass elements in compression”. ASCE J Str Eng, 137(8): 803-810.

Aiello, S., Campione, G., Minafò, G., and Scibilia, N. (2011). “Compressive behavior of laminated structural glass members”. Eng Struct, 33: 3402-3408.

Bio lzi L, Cattaneo S, Rosati G. (2010),” Progressive damage and fracture of laminated glass beams”, Constr Build Mater, 24 (4): 577-584.

Briccoli Bati, S., Ranocchiai, G., Reale, C. and Rovero, L. (2010). “Time-Dependent Behavior of Laminated Glass”. ASCE J Mat in Civ Eng, 22(4): 389-396.

Cam pione G., Di Paola M. and Minafò G. (2012) “Laminated glass members in compression: experiments and modeling”, ASCE Structural Journal (under review).

Galuppi L., and Royer-Carfagni G.F.(2012) ,” Effective thickness of laminated glass beams: New expression via a variational approach”, Engineering Structures, 38, 53-67.



Giuseppe Campione, Giovanni Minafò, Francesco Pomatestin

600450 Experimental investigation on the compressive response of laminated glass members glassonweb.com
Date: 19 July 2013
  • Giuseppe Campione, Giovanni Minafò, Francesco Poma

See more articles about

See more from this topic

Others also read

With the myriad of glass type available now, it is often confusing what to choose in terms of safety, thermal and solar performance and balancing cost with the benefits on offer.
Glass is a fantastic material… but sometimes it breaks.
Structural glass can be used as a fantastic alternative to a traditional façade system.
To provide stiffness, shading and privacy with abundant daylight and a feeling of openness for restaurant extensions and an entrance canopy to a London hotel, we used glass sandwich panels with aluminium honeycomb core.
When it comes to safety glass, there are generally two options that architects and designers of today will tend specify: toughened glass and laminated glass.
The term ‘Wind Load’ is used to refer to any pressures or forces that the wind exerts on a building or structure. There are actually three types of wind forces that would be exerted on a building.


101 Venture Way
Secaucus, NJ 07094-1808
United States

40 Corniche El-Nil,
Al Sharafain Tower Maadi,
Cairo Governorate

No. 160 Yichuan Rd.,
Jiaonan Shi
Qingdao Shi
Shandong Sheng, 266000

Polígono Industrial El Bayo, parcela I, 19
24492 Cubillos del Sil León

Is Kuleleri, Kule: 2, Kat: 22, 4. Levent
34330 Levent-Istanbul/İstanbul

Add new comment