Glass for Europe’s partners meet to discuss EPBD, circularity and new regulations

Glass for Europe’s National Partners Group meet to discuss EPBD implementation, circularity and the new CPR
Photo source
Glass for Europe

Date: 30 October 2025

On 28 October, Glass for Europe held its annual meeting with the National Partners Group (NPG), representing national glass and glazing associations across manufacturing, processing, and shaping.

The meeting was structured in two parts: the first, a workshop dedicated to the implementation of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), while the second addressed other regulatory challenges and upcoming policy initiatives relevant to the glass and glazing sector. 

As part of the revised EPBD, the European Commission was tasked with updating the methodology used to calculate the energy performance of buildings. The recast Article 4 specifically called for “guidance for the calculation of the energy performance of transparent building elements that form part of the building envelope and the consideration of ambient energy.” This guidance was published on 30 June. 

With Member States required to transpose the new EPBD by May 2026, Glass for Europe took the opportunity to engage with the NPG on how this guidance could be leveraged to enhance the assessment of glazing performance and ensure it is appropriately reflected in national regulations.

The new guidance encourages Member States to define minimum performance requirements for transparent building elements based on their U-value (thermal transmittance) and g-value (solar factor), the latter reflecting the level of solar heat gain through glazing. During the meeting, National Partners exchanged insights on how to ensure these recommendations translate into concrete regulatory updates in their respective countries. They also discussed how the use of this guidance could support better management of overheating risks and enhance summer thermal comfort in buildings, two increasingly critical aspects in the context of Europe’s changing climate and energy efficiency goals.

During the second part of the meeting, the National Partners Group (NPG) received updates on two key legislative files: the Construction Products Regulation (CPR) and the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR). Members discussed the potential impacts of these regulations on the glass and glazing sector, as well as the upcoming compliance requirements that manufacturers and processors will need to prepare for.

The conversation also turned to the topic of circularity, a growing priority across the European flat glass value chain. Participants exchanged experiences and best practices related to the collection and recycling of glass, particularly the recovery of cullet (recycled glass). Examples were shared of effective measures already in place, such as the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes operating in France and the Netherlands, which aim to increase the volume of post-consumer glass collected and reintegrated into production.

600450 Glass for Europe’s partners meet to discuss EPBD, circularity and new regulations glassonweb.com

See more news about:

Others also read

AIA has created a commitment framework to help architects better serve their communities by building resilience and disaster risk reduction into the design and planning of new construction and renovation projects.
From 1 to 5 July, the European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (eceee) held its summer study around the Lac d’Ailette (France).
EVERLAM has once again been awarded the EcoVadis Bronze Medal, reaffirming its commitment to sustainability and responsible business practices.
The planet doesn’t argue. It doesn’t negotiate. It sends signals—rising seas, raging wildfires, heatwaves, melting glaciers. We said 1.5°C was the limit. We are crossing it.
This industry is among the most energy-intensive sectors there are. Melting tanks operate round the clock, fossil fuels dominate production. Decarbonising this industry is a challenge.
For many installers, waste removal has traditionally been viewed as little more than a necessary operational task, arrange a skip, clear the site, move onto the next job.

Add new comment

NEWS RELATED PRODUCTS