GlassOnWeb.com - Glass News - Transvaal Study Says Plans Not Followed
 
 HOME   DIRECTORY   NEWS   ARTICLES   BUSINESS AREA   FORUM    JOBS  
 
Sign-in | Registration
  »  Home  »  News  »  Transvaal Study Says Plans Not Followed
 
 
   CONTRIBUTE
Submit your news
Submitted news

   NEWS ARCHIVES
2013
May
April
March
February
January
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001



GLASS ON WEB - news feed
 
  News


Architecture
Transvaal Study Says Plans Not Followed

The city official charged with criminal negligence over the Transvaal water park tragedy has attempted to clear his name by presenting an independent expert committee's finding that he was not to blame.

Anatoly Voronin, who could face up to seven years in prison if found guilty when the case finally goes to court, presented the committee's report last week at a news conference together with Alexei Vorontsov, the vice president of the Russian Architects' Union.

The report says that Mosgosekspertiza, or Moscow State Expertise, the body headed by Voronin that inspects construction plans for quality, had fulfilled all of its obligations in reviewing the plans and issuing approval and thus was not responsible for the disaster.

On Feb. 14, 2004, the glass roof of Transvaal water park in southwestern Moscow collapsed, killing 28 people and injuring more than 100.

The other person charged in connection with the collapse was Nodar Kancheli, the architect who designed the roof. Kancheli has repeatedly denied responsibility for the collapse, saying that the tragedy may have been a terrorist attack.

The Russian Academy of Architecture and Construction Sciences, which evaluated Moscow State Expertise's actions with regard to Transvaal, found that the plan approved by the agency had been amended and that change could have led to the collapse. Attention was drawn to these modifications only after the disaster. The depth of the foundation, the structure of the dome and the type of steel used to build support columns did not correspond to the approved design. Also, the sagging of the roof was not studied well enough to guarantee the safety of the building, the committee said in a statement.

More on the source link...


December 14th, 2005
Source: Themoscowtimes.com


Print this article  Printer friendly version Send this article to a friend  Send to a Friend


Share on :   facebook  twitter  google  yahoo  linkedin  delicious  digg  mixx  stumbleupon   email



Add a Comment

You have to be registered in order to add your comment.
If you already have an account, please sign-in to comment.




Latest news
May-17-13
Guardian Industries to Debut First-of-Its-Kind BIM Solution and New Low-E Glass Innovation at AIA June 20-22
May-17-13
The Wonders of Warsaw!
May-17-13
Global Safety Glass Market to 2017
May-17-13
Annual Glass Conference (German Society of Glass Technology)
May-17-13
Sphinx Glass in Libya Build Fair
May-17-13
Glazing Vision progress in Europe
May-17-13
IGMA 12th Annual Summer Conference Registration is Open
May-17-13
Thomsen Discusses Upcoming GPD Speech in New Video
May-17-13
New pictures Prestige Ticketing
May-17-13
Middlesbrough recycling firm reaps benefits of £750,000 investment






ADVERTISING

The emissions produced by our servers are offset by renewable energy projects that reduce the use of fossil fuels. These projects are verified by The Voluntary Carbon Standard.