For such applications post breakage strength of laminated glass construction is of utmost importance. Pre breakage strength can be predicted with reasonable accuracy by FEM technique based software packages like SJ Mepla, which allow the user to input mechanical properties of viscoelastic interlayers along with glass.
This helps in interlayer based differentiation of pre breakage structural strength and design optimization. However, post breakage strength of glass is still an unknown area as analytical models for this are inconclusive so far and thus destructive testing is the only reliable solution.
Impact testing, simulating the accidental fall of a maintenance worker was done to assess the “fall through” resistance of point fixed laminated glass constructions having varying interlayers viz, PVB, Ionomer, Stiff PVB, and EVA.
In addition, medium duration (30 mins or more) post breakage strength tests driven by the new requirements set in place by German Standard pr DIN 18008-6 were conducted at subzero (-20°C), room temperature (21°C) and at elevated temperatures of 50°C. Deflection measurements were also made to estimate the modulus value of the broken laminate construction.
Malvinder Singh Rooprai
Laminated glass has a significant improvement in the post breakage strength over a monolithic layer of glass, the glass fragments adhere to the interlayers so that a certain remaining structural capacity is obtained as the glass fragments ‘arch’ or lock in place. This capacity depends on the fragmentation of the glass and increases with increasing fragment size.
Therefore, laminated glass elements achieve a particularly high remaining structural capacity when made from annealed or heat strengthened glass that breaks into large fragments. The post breakage behavior furthermore depends on the interlayer material. The most common interlayer is PVB whose mechanical properties are heavily depended on temperature and load duration.
At room temperature, PVB is soft with an elongation at break of more than 250%. For higher temperatures and load durations the shear transfer is greatly affected 1. Low stiffness of the PVB interlayer results in “Blanket Effect” (Fig. 1) as soon as the glass breaks even for vertical applications because of the self-weight of the panel especially with large panel sizes and minimal supports.
Ionomer interlayers from Kuraray (originally invented by DuPont), was developed with the aim of achieving higher stiffness, temperature resistance, resistance to tearing in point fixed rotule applications. This helps in achieving a superior post breakage strength and design redundancy.
Above table gives a comparison of the mechanical properties of Ionomer, PVB, Stiff PVB interlayers.
Post breakage strength is significantly affected by the breakage pattern of the glass layers, support conditions, and temperature. Breakage pattern of glass can be a big variable even for the same type of glass and this makes analytical modeling of its post breakage strength a near impossible task. Thus engineers have to rely on destructive testing for this. Post breakage strength can be categorized as follows.
1.Immediate Post Breakage Strength against “fall through”
2.Medium Duration Post Breakage Strength Testing (More than 30 Mins. As per pr DIN 18008–6)
Separate tests were conducted for both above types of strengths and same have been presented in this paper.
Fig.1: The Blanket Effect
1.Immediate Post Breakage Strength against “fall through”
Impact tests were done at Intertek ATI Inc. York, Pennsylvania by dropping a soft bag weighing 100 Kgs (typical weight of maintenance working along his tools and tackles) from a height of 1.2 mts at a test temperature of 50ºC.
The test method simulates potential loading from installation and/or maintenance workers in distress. The panels were conditioned at 50°C for 1 hour before the test. The test set up was enclosed with insulated panels to ensure there is no variation in test results due to temperature. The insulated panels were removed just before the impact.
Fig. 2 (a & b): Frameless (point supported) canopy application under static load
Fig. 2a shows how the laminate made from Ionomer interlayer provided a barrier against the impactor under static load. The impactor was removed after 15 minutes without any tearing of interlayer observed at the rotules (Fig. 2b). In the subsequent impact test, this laminate provides “Fall Through” restistance (Fig. 3), whilst laminates made from EVA, PVB and Stiff PVB in Fig. 4, 5, 6 respectively, collapsed as soon as the impactor struck, and failed to act as a barrier.
Fig. 3: Ionomer laminate provided “Fall Through” resistance
Fig. 4: EVA laminate provided no “Fall Through” resistance
Fig. 5: PVB laminate provided no “Fall Through” resistance
Fig. 6: Stiff PVB laminate provided no “Fall Through” resistance
2. Medium Duration Post Breakage Strength Testing
(30 Minutes or more)
German Standard pr DIN 18008–6, (Glass in Buildings – Design & Construction Rules – Additional requirements for walk-on glazings in case of maintenance procedures) in February 2015, has made the post breakage performance requirements for an overhead glazing, that is accessible for maintenance and cleaning, much more stringent than ever before.
The new regulation requires a laminated glass construction to sustain the weight of 100 Kg for at least 30 minutes after breakage of top layer of glass. First, the panel is subjected to an impact made by dropping a twin tyre impactor which weighs 50 Kg from a height of 900 mm.
This is followed by imposing a load of 100 Kg for 30 minutes on an area of 200 x 200 mm (Fig. 7). After breakage of the uppermost glass layer, the whole glazing element must stay on its supports for at least 30 minutes. The test is successful if the specimen does not slide from the supports, the impact does not penetrate the laminated glass and no dangerous glass fragments fall down2.
Fig. 7: Post Breakage Test layout
Post breakage strength tests on point supported glass panels (1.5 m x 2.0 m) for a typical canopy application were conducted at University of Armed Forces in Munich, Germany. 9 glass panels with each of 4 different interlayers – Ionomer (1.52 & 0.89 mm), Stiff PVB (1.52 mm), and PVB (1.52 mm) were prepared for testing at 3 different temperature scenarios.
The objective was to know which interlayer type laminate construction can pass the requirements set by pr DIN 18008-6 at 3 different temperatures (-20 °C, +21 °C and +50 °C). 3 panels were tested for each temperature scenario. An attempt was made to know the ultimate capacity of the laminates. However, the test apparatus had a limitation of applying a maximum load of 400 Kg.
The laminates were conditioned for at least 3 hours for each temperature scenario. The test chamber had a temperature control mechanism for -25 °C to +25 °C. The laminate construction with all different types of interlayers was strong enough to withstand the impact against any breakage. Therefore the upper layer of laminates in each case had to be broken manually with a centre punch.
It was followed by placing a 100 Kg concrete block on the glass panel for 30 minutes. The test was aimed to know the ultimate post breakage performance limit so load was ramped up to 400 Kg in increments of 100 Kg, with a 15 minute time interval between each load increment.
Laminates with Ionomer and Stiff PVB interlayers sustained this load of 400 Kg without collapse at -20 °C and + 21 °C temperatures (Fig. 8), whereas in Fig. 9, PVB laminate could not sustain the 100 Kg imposed load at 21 °C as it collapsed in few seconds when load was placed due to tearing of the interlayer at rotules.
At elevated temperature of 50 °C, broken laminate construction with PVB & Stiff PVB interlayers could not sustain their own se lf weight as they collapsed (Fig. 10 & Fig. 11) soon after breakage of both layers.
Fig. 8: 400 Kg load on Ionomer laminate at 21 °C
Fig. 9: Collapsed PVB laminate with 100 Kg at 21 °C
Fig.10: Broken PVB laminate collapsed at 50 °C
Fig.11: Broken Stiff PVB laminate collapsed at 50 °C
Fig. 12: 0.89 Ionomer laminate collapsed at 200 Kg
Fig. 13: 1.52 Ionomer laminate collapsed at 300 Kg
Whereas, the laminate construction made with 0.89 mm Ionomer interlayer sustained a weight of 100 Kg for more than 30 minutes and collapsed when load was ramped up to 200 Kg. (Fig. 12). Similarly, 1.52 mm Ionomer laminate could sustain a load of 200 Kg for more than 30 minutes after breakage and collapsed when load was ramped up to 300 Kg (Fig. 13).
Deflection Measurements for Estimating Modulus of Broken Laminate
Deflection measurements were made during the test for all three temperature scenarios to make a reverse estimate of the modulus value of the laminate construction. At –20 °C the 1.52 mm Ionomer laminate demonstrated the lowest deflection after 30 min (Fig. 14), whilst at +21° C the ionomer laminates as well as the laminate with a stiff PVB interlayer outperformed the standard PVB laminate (Fig. 15). At +50°C laminates with SentryGlas® ionoplast interlayer outperformed the stiff PVB. (Fig. 16.)
1. At -20 °C, laminates made from the 4 interlayer candidates i.e 0.89 Ionomer, 1.52 mm Ionomer, 1.52 mm PVB, 1.52 Stiff PVB pass the post breakage strength requirements of the new German Standard pr DIN 18008 – 6.
2. At -20 °C, all 4 candidates had their ultimate strength more than 400 Kg as there was no collapse of the panel due to tearing of the interlayer at rotules.
3. At 21 °C, Ionomer and Stiff PVB laminates pass the post breakage strength requirements of DIN 18008–6 but PVB laminate does not.
4. At 21 °C, 0.89 mm & 1.52 mm Ionomer laminate had almost similar post breakage strength till about 45 minutes from the breakage.
5. For tropical climate regions where the ambient temperature is more than 45 °C, Ionomer interlayer laminates meet and exceed the requirements of pr DIN 18008-6 Standard.
1. Structural Engineering Documents 10, Structural Use of Glass - Matthias Haldimann, Andreas Luible, Mauro Overend, ISBN 978-3-85748-119-2, 2008, Page 14-15.
2. Structural Engineering Documents 10, Structural Use of Glass - Matthias Haldimann, Andreas Luible, Mauro Overend, ISBN 978-3-85748-119-2, 2008, Page 172.