GlassOnWeb.com - Glass News - University of Tennessee Team Wins Visteon Award at FutureTruck Competition Glassfiles.com
 
 HOME   DIRECTORY   NEWS   ARTICLES   BUSINESS AREA   FORUM    JOBS  
 
Sign-in | Registration
  »  Home  »  News  »  University of Tennessee Team Wins Visteon Award at FutureTruck Competition
 
AGC
 
   CONTRIBUTE
Submit your news
Submitted news

   NEWS ARCHIVES
2009
January
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001




GLASS ON WEB - news feed
 
  News


Companies
University of Tennessee Team Wins Visteon Award at FutureTruck Competition

Visteon Corporation (NYSE: VC), a sponsor of the FutureTruck 2004 competition, salutes the team from the University of Tennessee, winner of the Visteon Award, given to the team that demonstrated the most innovative use of electronics in its FutureTruck vehicle.

FutureTruck challenges teams of engineering students from 15 top North American universities to re-engineer 2002 Ford Explorers to reduce emissions and achieve at least a 25 percent improvement in fuel economy.

Managed by the Argonne National Laboratory's Center for Transportation Research and led by Ford Motor Co. and the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, FutureTruck helps develop hundreds of highly skilled engineers. The competition builds the students' awareness of fuel-saving technologies and prepares them to lead the auto industry in the 21st Century.

After months of work, the teams took their vehicles to Ford's Michigan Proving Ground in Romeo, Michigan, on June 15 and 16 for a comprehensive safety evaluation, and a battery of static and dynamic testing.

The Visteon Award was created specifically to evaluate the innovative application of electrical systems and electronics in the vehicles. A team of judges, including Visteon engineers Tom Gioia, Greg Gumkowski and John Quigley, as well as Randy Visintainer and Prasad Prasad of Ford, selected the University of Tennessee team after inspecting the vehicles and questioning the teams over the last two days. Penn State University finished second and the University of Wisconsin came in third.

The judges used a variety of criteria. Among these were marketability, originality, ease-of-use, the cost of electronics compared to the improvement in fuel economy, ability to diagnose things gone wrong and efficiency of design and minimal use of wires.




June 17th, 2004
Photo: Visteon
Source: Visteon


Print this article  Printer friendly version Send this article to a friend  Send to a Friend



Add a Comment

You have to be registered in order to add your comment.
If you already have an account, please sign-in to comment.




Latest news
Dec-22-08
Isover opens international competition
Dec-22-08
PPG publishes new sustainable building products brochure
Dec-22-08
Expansion of Production Capacity of Raw Materials for Interlayer Film for Laminated Glass
Dec-22-08
GLASSONWEB SEASONS GREETINGS
Dec-20-08
Slovakia: Vetropack launches new glass cullet line
Dec-20-08
Asahi Glass Announces Revision of Operating Results Outlook (Consolidated)
Dec-20-08
SCHOTT increases sales and profit in 2008
Dec-20-08
Glaston ends employee co-operation negotiations in Finland
Dec-20-08
Trakya Cam to decide on Bulgaria investment in 2009
Dec-19-08
Glass manufacturer temporarily shuts down


ADVERTISING